The need for a place to conduct post mortem examinations
was not mentioned in any of Wilmot's proposals for a morgue, although
he had suggested that an Assistant Surgeon be appointed to his staff,
observing that 'Medical jurisprudence is now regarded as a distinct
branch of science, and well worth the attention and fostering of enlightened
legislature'.67
Youl included the cost of 'a post mortem examination room &c'
in his estimates of the cost of the morgue in 1854. From being just
one of the functions of the morgue, the importance of the post
mortem grew over time. In a sample of inquests we have examined
from the morgue in 1859, 42% included a post mortem examination.
In 1896-7 that figure had risen to 82%, and a medical examination
of the body - without opening it - was held in a further 5% of cases.68
By the time the jury was practically abolished in 1903, the importance
of professional knowledge of the body had overtaken the value given
to the observations of the lay jurors. By creating a regular supply
of bodies, especially for practitioners like Neild and Crawford Mollison,
the morgue fostered the development of forensic medicine in Victoria
as much as it was the product of this developing field.
The establishment of a central, custom-built morgue in Melbourne
in the mid-1850s appears to have taken place earlier than in London
or New York; Melbourne was in a sense the laboratory of Empire. The
needs of family, friends and state to identify the dead in an immigrant
society, and the heat of the Australian summer, provided the impetus.
To these endogenous colonial factors can be added a falling tolerance
found throughout the West in the nineteenth century to unpleasant
sights, smells, and the mere presence of the dead. Ultimately, the
anxiety created by these feelings was enough to ensure that Melbourne's
morgue did not stay in a prominent position for long. With occasional
exceptions of public spectacle, the morgue became the institutional
home of the Coroner, and a site for forensic expertise. It began to
develop its own institutional culture, largely sequestered from the
city around it.
Notes
1. The authors
thank the following for feedback on their research: respondents to
a query posted on H-URBAN; participants in the Melbourne Urban History
Discussion Group; delegates at a paper delivered at the 5th International
Conference on The Social Context of Death, Dying and Disposal, Goldsmith's
College, University of London, September 2000. Thanks also to Sam
Furphy, Helen Harris, Christina Twomey, Dean Wilson and Juliet Flesch
for references and research assistance.
2. 'A Jury man'
to Colonial Secretary, 16 February 1855, Public Record Office Victoria,
VPRS 1189, Unit 135, Item L55/2462.
3. Age,
16 February 1855.
4. Times,
9 January 1854; 14 January 1864; 28 April 1864; 8 July 1864; New
York Times, 28 April 1864.
5. The American
morgue, championed initially by the Commissioner of Charities and
Corrections and constructed 'upon the plan of the famous Morgue at
Paris', had by 1882 itself become a repulsive, decaying structure
'unworthy of our civilization', and was relocated a decade later.
J DeLuca, 'Morgues' in KT Jackson (ed.), The Encyclopedia of New
York City, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., & New
York Historical Society, 1995, pp. 770-1; New York Times,
1 July 1865; 8 February 1866; 20 June 1866; 23 February 1882; 15 May
1892.
6. Pat Jalland's
Australian ways of death: a social and cultural history 1840-1918,
Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, 2002, is the most comprehensive
history of death and loss in Australia.
7. Allan Mitchell,
'The Paris morgue as a social institution in the nineteenth century',
Francia, vol. 4, 1976, pp. 581-96; id., 'Philippe Ariès
and the French way of death', French Historical Studies,
vol. 10, 1978, pp. 691-4.
8. Unless otherwise
indicated, this paper draws on correspondence files located in PROV:
VPRS 24, Units 56, 62, 65, 69; VPRS 44, Unit 687; VPRS 69, Units 3,
14; VPRS 242, Unit 17; VPRS 266, Units 3A, 284, 413; VPRS 1189, Unit
146; VPRS 1198, Units 128, 133, 185, 191.
9. Melbourne
City Council Minutes, vol. 6, pp. 1893-4 (7 June 1852) and p. 1895
(21 June 1852).
10. loc. cit.;
D Dunstan, Governing the metropolis: politics, technology and
social change in a Victorian city: Melbourne 1850-1891, Melbourne
University Press, 1984, p. 149.
11. Coroner
Wilmot to Colonial Secretary, 13 January 1853, VPRS 1198, Unit 128,
Item 53/446.
12. Argus,
11 January 11 1853. Unfortunately, there is still no social history
of the coroner in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but there
is a growing body of work on related issues: TR Forbes, 'Crowner's
quest', Transactions of the American Philosophical Society,
vol. 68, 1978, pp. 1-52; JDJ Havard, The detection of secret homicide:
a study of the medico-legal system of investigation of sudden and
unexplained deaths, Macmillan, London, 1960; RF Hunnisett, 'The
importance of eighteenth-century coroners' bills', in EW Ives and
AH Manchester (eds), Law, Litigants and the Legal Profession:
Papers presented to the Fourth British Legal History Conference at
the University of Birmingham, 10-13 July 1979, Royal Historical
Society, London, & Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1983,
pp. 126-39; E Cawthon, 'Thomas Wakely and the medical coronership:
occupational death and the judicial process', Medical History,
vol. 30, 1986, pp. 191-202, and 'New life for the deodand: coroners'
inquests and occupational deaths in England, 1830-46', American
Journal of Legal History, vol. 33, 1989, pp. 137-47; J Sim &
T Ward, 'The magistrate of the poor? Coroners and deaths in custody
in nineteenth-century England', in M Clark & C Crawford (eds),
Legal Medicine in History, Cambridge University Press, 1994,
pp. 245-67; O Anderson, Suicide in Victorian and Edwardian England,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987, chap. 1; R Richardson, Death, dissection
and the destitute, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1987;
M MacDonald and TR Murphy, Sleepless souls: suicide in Early Modern
England, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990, chap. 4; IA Burney, 'Viewing
bodies: medicine, public order, and English inquest practice', Configurations,
vol. 2, no. 1, 1994, pp. 33-46; RW England, Jr, 'Investigating homicides
in Northern England, 1800-1824', Criminal Justice History,
vol. 6, 1985, pp. 105-23; D Zuck, 'Mr Troutbeck as the surgeon's friend:
the coroner and the doctors - an Edwardian comedy', Medical History,
vol. 39, 1995, pp. 259-87; GHH Glasgow, 'The election of county coroners
in England and Wales circa 1800-1888', Journal of Legal History,
vol. 20, no. 3, 1999, pp. 75-108; IA Burney, Bodies of evidence:
medicine and the politics of the English inquest, 1830-1926,
Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1999; MB Emmerichs,
'Getting away with murder? Homicide and the coroners in nineteenth-century
London', Social Science History, vol. 25, no. 1, 2001, pp.
93-100.
13. An
Act to consolidate and amend the Laws relating to the licensing of
Public Houses and the Sale of Fermented and Spiritous Liquors,
27 Vic. No. 227 (1864) s. 55.
14. CH Mollison
commenting on GA Paton, 'The development of forensic medicine', Proceedings
of the Medico-Legal Society of Victoria, vol. 4, 1939-41, p.
261. Mollison's textbook draws on his experience in Melbourne's morgue:
Lectures on forensic medicine (1921). See also 'Some medico-legal
reminiscences', Proceedings of the Medico-Legal Society of Victoria,
vol. 2, 1933-6, pp. 63-83.
15. From sampling
of VPRS 24, Coroners' Inquest Papers.
16. A Higonnet,
M Higonnet & P Higonnet, 'Façades: Walter Benjamin's Paris',
Critical Inquiry, vol. 10, 1984, pp. 391-419; VR Schwartz,
'The morgue and the Musée Grévin: understanding the
public taste for reality in fin-de-siècle Paris', The Yale
Journal of Criticism, vol. 7, 1994, pp. 151-73; Mitchell, 'The
Paris morgue'; B Bertherat, 'Les visiteurs de la morgue', L'Histoire,
vol. 180, 1994, pp. 16-21.
17. F Maillard,
Recherches historiques et critique sur la morgue, Paris,
1860, pp. 92-3.
18. Quoted
in Maillard, p. 94.
19. Mitchell,
'The Paris morgue', pp. 581-2; Bertherat, pp. 16-21.
20. VPRS 266,
Crown Law Office Inwards Correspondence, Unit 284, Item 75/4301.
21. Age,
13 January 1871.
22. In 1869
the Board of Health included identification as a function of the morgue.
The Argus agreed with Youl and the Mayor: Argus,
30 December 1854.
23. Melbourne's
average maximum temperatures in the summer months are approximately
4oC higher than those of London or Paris. While New York City experiences
higher average summer maximums, Melbourne's overall average yearly
temperature and highest maximum temperatures exceed those of the other
three cities.
24. M Perrot
(ed.), A history of private life, vol. IV: From the fires
of revolution to the Great War, Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990, pp. 468-75; L Prior's 'Policing the
dead: a sociology of the mortuary', Sociology, vol. 21, 1987,
pp. 355-76 develops this theme, but not in an historical framework;
IA Burney's 'Viewing bodies' discusses the limits of the medical gaze,
which was enforced by the popularity of the coroners' jury. It is
interesting to note that the Victorian coroners' jury was, for all
practical purposes, abolished in 1903 (Coroners Act 1903,
3 Edw. VII, No. 1828).
25. Wilmot
to Colonial Secretary, 1 March 1853, VPRS 1198, Unit 128, stack marked
'Coroner', Item A53/2204.
26. loc. cit.
27. The regulation
of nineteenth-century public space generally, and women's value as
the focus of male competitive exchange that involved the stereotype
of female 'delicacy' being invoked in the mitigation of a variety
of perceived urban nuisances in particular, have been explored in
relation to nineteenth-century Melbourne in A Brown-May, Melbourne
street life, Australian Scholarly Publishing, 1998.
28. MCC Minutes,
9 August 1853.
29. Argus,
22 April 1854; 15 May 1854.
30. Colonial
Engineer to Colonial Secretary, 26 May 1854, VPRS 1198, Unit 128,
stack marked 'Coroner', Item E54/5695.
31. Argus,
10 June 1854.
32. Argus,
1 December 1854; see also Argus, 30 December 1854.
33. Argus,
3 January 1855.
34. Argus,
27 January 1855.
35. VPRS 937,
Unit 284.
36. Inspector
General of Public Works to Assistant Commissioner of Crown Lands,
13 September 1864, VPRS 44, Unit 687, J64/8348.
37. Minute
for the Chief Commissioner of Police by the Inspector General of Public
Works, 8 May 1867, VPRS 266, Unit 284, Item 75/4301.
38. Anderson,
chap. 1; Havard, chap. 4.
39. M Finnane,
Police and government: histories of policing in Australia,
Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1994, chap. 1; R Haldane, The
people's force: a history of the Victoria Police, Melbourne University
Press, 1986.
40. Argus,
13 February 1871.
41. Victorian
Parliamentary Debates (VPD), vol. 25, 13 December 1876, p. 1734.
42. Candler
to the Minister of Justice, 17 August 1878, VPRS 266, Unit 317.
43. Argus,
17 January 1900.
44. Age,
20 April 1908.
45. VPD,
vol. 45, 9 July 1884, p. 494.
46. Youl, 9
July 1884, VPRS 266, Unit 413, Item 87/3721.
47. Secretary
Harriman, Crown Law Office, Memo, 8 July 1887, VPRS 266, Unit 413,
Item 87/3721.
48. VPD,
vol. 48, 28 July 1885, p. 460.
49. VPD,
vol. 52, 24 August 1886, p. 1178.
50. loc. cit.
51. VPRS 266,
Unit 284, Item 75/4301.
52. loc. cit.
53. VPD,
Session 1886, vol. 53, 8 December 1886, p. 2699.
54. Bulletin,
9 July 1892, p. 21.
55. Bulletin,
21 January 1898.
56. loc. cit.
57. Gozlan
quoted in Maillard, p. 93. See also K Baedeker's Paris and its
environs, Leipsic, 1900, p. 227.
58. On the
Paris morgue as spectacle see V Schwartz, Spectacular realities:
early mass culture in fin-de-siècle Paris, University
of California Press, Berkeley, 1998, pp. 45-88.
59. Argus,
20 December 1898; Maillard, p. 87.
60. See for
example N Elias, The civilising process, trans. E Jephcott,
Urizen Books, New York, 1978; A Corbin, The foul and the fragrant:
odor and the French social imagination, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Mass., 1986.
61. Burney,
'Viewing bodies', p. 33.
62. P Ariès,
Western attitudes toward death: from the Middle Ages to the present,
trans. PM Ranum, Marion Boyars, London, 1976; and The hour of
our death, trans. H Weaver, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1983 (1977).
See also G Gorer, 'The pornography of death', Encounter,
vol. 5, 1955, pp. 49-52; and Death, grief, and mourning in contemporary
Britain, Cresset Press, London, 1965.
63. A Kellehear,
'Are we a "death-denying" society? A sociological review',
Social Science and Medicine, vol. 18, 1984, pp. 713-23; T
Walter, 'Modern death: taboo or not taboo?', Sociology, vol.
25, 1991, pp. 293-310. Historians have also criticised this aspect
of Ariès's achievement: R Houlbrooke, 'Introduction' to his
(ed.), Death, Ritual, and Bereavement, Routledge, London,
1989, p. 4; D Cannadine, 'War and death, grief and mourning in modern
Britain', in J Whaley (ed.), Mirrors of Mortality: Studies in
the Social History of Death, Europa, London, 1981, pp. 187-242;
PC Jupp & C Gittings (eds), Death in England: an illustrated
history, Manchester University Press, 1999, p. 2.
64. Age,
13 January 1870.
65. On changing
attitudes to public urination and expectoration in the nineteenth-century
city, see Brown-May, pp. 64-88.
66. S Cooke,
'A "dirty little secret"? The State, the press, and popular
knowledge of suicide in Victoria, 1840s-1920s', Australian Historical
Studies, vol. 115, 2000, pp. 304-24.
67. WB Wilmot,
9 July 1853, VPRS 1189, Unit 146, Item C53/6852.
68. From a
sample of 100 consecutive inquests held in Melbourne (57 of which
were at the morgue) between 2 September 1896 and 18 January 1897 (VPRS
1205/P1).
- - -