Home >> Publications >> Keeping the Record Public Symposium >> John Charleson
 
Paper: John
Charleson

Public Administration and the Public Record
John Charleson
Deputy Secretary, Corporate Services, Victorian Department of Justice
Introduction
It has been fascinating to listen to the eminent speakers who have preceded
me, and I hope that you will find my presentation interesting as well.
My name is John Charleson, and I am the Deputy Secretary,
Corporate Services in the Victorian Department of Justice. I am standing
in today for Penny Armytage, the Secretary of the Department, who unfortunately
is unable to be with us this afternoon.
To give you a brief idea of what I do, I am responsible
for supporting the work of Department of Justice business units by providing
essential corporate services such as human resource and financial management,
executive and business services. I am also responsible for co-ordinating
key corporate activities such as budgets, industrial relations and capital
planning across the wider portfolio. The field of records management lies
under the business services area of my responsibilities.
To put it in a broader context, the Department of Justice
is the successor to the ‘Law Department’ which you will have
seen mentioned in the brochure for this symposium – and it encompasses
a much more extensive range of activities than the former Law Department.
One of the current nine Victorian Government departments, the Department
of Justice was established in October 1992 – a little over ten years
ago now – when the Kennett government came to power. It provides
the organisational, policy and management focus towards achieving the
government’s priority of building a safe and just Victoria, and
currently includes a wide range of important functions such as crime prevention,
police, courts, correctional services, emergency services, consumer affairs
and, since last year’s state election, gambling regulation, liquor
licencing and trade measurement.
The reason that I am speaking to you this afternoon of
course is to celebrate the hundredth anniversary of the far-sighted transfer
on this very day in 1903 of ten volumes of convict indent records from
the then Law Department to the then Public Library of Victoria, which
became the first holdings of Victoria’s fledgling state archives;
and I am particularly pleased that original convict indent records and
indexes to registered correspondence which kept track of where the records
came from and where they were sent to are on display in the foyer today.
Ever since that historic first transfer of records, the
management and preservation of records created by Victorian Government
departments has become, and remains to this day, a significant on-going
issue for both senior public servants such as myself and elected representatives.
And as the successor to the Law Department, the Department of Justice
has a very special connection among Victorian Government departments to
the formation of the splendid archive now in the safe custody of Public
Record Office Victoria.
Yesterday
I would like to trace for you now some of the key historical events in
the development of the relationship between ourselves and Victoria’s
state archives, with particular reference to the long involvement of the
Law Department. In doing so, I will be drawing significantly on Bill Russell’s
working draft ‘History of the Public Record Office of Victoria’
(May 2003), and I would like to thank Bill for making this comprehensive
document available to me.
Again, to provide some more context for you, the Law Department
was originally established in 1851, following the separation of Port Phillip
from New South Wales. Two ministers were appointed at that time to administer
the new department – William Stawell as Attorney-General and Redmond
Barry as Solicitor-General, and the department began to function three
years later. The public service moved slowly in those days – too
many potential public servants were no doubt out and about searching for
that elusive pot of gold!
Although for the period from 1861 to 1890 a third Minister
of the Crown under the title of Minster of Justice assisted in the administration
of the Law Department, it continued under dual administration until the
passing of the Solicitor-General Act 1951, which provided for
the appointment of the first Solicitor-General who was not also a Minister
of the Crown. From that time on, the department was administered solely
by the Attorney-General.
It is worth noting that in the Department of Justice’s
library collection today we still have volumes bearing the bookplate of
Ned Kelly’s nemesis, Sir Redmond Barry! It was Barry by the way,
who, as President of the Library Trustees, declared one of John Batman's
deeds acquired by the Library in 1879 as having ‘no intrinsic worth’!
One would imagine that his opinion of the convict indents we are remembering
today would have been no less charitable.
The Law Department was basically responsible for the provision
of an efficient and effective legal system for the people of Victoria,
mainly through administration of the courts. It was renamed the Attorney-General’s
Department by the Cain government more than a hundred years later in 1987.
The Attorney-General’s Department in turn was subsumed by the Department
of Justice in 1992.
Along with the Public Library of Victoria, the Historical
Society of Victoria, and the history school of the University of Melbourne,
I am proud to record that the Law Department was one of the four key players
which contributed in particular to the early protection of Victoria’s
archives before the passage of the Public Records Act 1973 and
the establishment of the Public Record Office.
The department was the first government agency to transfer
any of its records to both the Public Library and the Historical Society,
and instrumental in securing a provision in the Victorian Companies
Act 1958 that could be regarded as the state’s first archival
legislation. In addition, it was the source of critical contributions
to the campaign for a public records Act, especially through the sterling
efforts of one of its secretaries – Harold Carter Chipman.
In July 1903, the Chief Librarian of the Melbourne Public
Library, Edward La Touche Armstrong, made history when he received from
Matthew Byrne, Secretary of the Law Department at the time the first formal
transfer of official records from a Victorian Government department to
the Library. These records consisted of some ten volumes of convict indents.
The battered books, now serialised as VPRS 107, were large in format,
covered in old calf leather, and contained printed identities, ship by
ship, of the convicts who had arrived in Sydney in the 1830s. By way of
explanation, the indent record provides a summary of a convict's demographic
and sentencing details, for example, their name, place of birth, occupation,
and the offences for which they have been convicted and the length of
the sentence involved. The term ‘prisoner indent report’ is
still in use today in the correctional services area of the Department
of Justice. Armstrong made notes about their administrative significance,
and indeed his handwritten comments have survived to this day, bound into
one of the volumes, thereby completing the initiation of the Victorian
archives.
Armstrong favoured the establishment of a public record
office at the time (some seventy years before it came to fruition), but
he did not want to build an archive in the Library. Although he appears
to have failed to recognise the seminal significance of the convict indents
in Victoria’s archival history, he was nevertheless interested in
old records and we know that he visited the Geelong Police Station and
Court House to look for them.
His personal contacts would have been invaluable here,
since he had been born in Geelong and had trained as a lawyer, while his
father had worked as a Crown Prosecutor in Geelong. Armstrong later made
similar inquiries regarding old records of the Clerk of Courts at Sale,
a public servant who had previously been the Clerk of Courts in Geelong.
In 1928 a circular was sent out as a Premier’s Instruction
requiring all government departments to consult the Library Trustees before
destroying official records. Following this instruction, and an inspection
of records by Librarian Ernest Pitt, a number of offers were made by several
government departments to transfer records to the Library, including six
further volumes of convict indents spanning the period 1831–1842
from the Law Department. Today, Public Record Office Victoria holds a
total of 30 volumes of these priceless convict indents.
Penal Department records were transferred from Pentridge
Prison in September 1933. Records transferred from Pentridge (which ultimately
closed in 1997 while under the management of the Department of Justice
when Victoria’s first privately-managed prisons came on line) have,
unfortunately, not always been in a usable condition. We discovered this
recently when a member of the public researching their family history
was unable to access the register of specific interest because its pages
were still stuck firmly together following water damage sustained in extinguishing
a fire at the prison – and to repair the register would have been
prohibitively expensive! For many years, historical records of prisoners
were held at Pentridge in primitive and unsatisfactory conditions in underground
dungeons in the prison’s notorious D division. Thankfully, many
of these records have now found a more appropriate home at PROV.
The sometimes less than perfect state of preservation of
justice-related public records has a long and often colourful history.
In 1857, for example, a Mr Horne, MP declared in parliament that
many of the deeds in the Supreme Court Registry Office
were almost entirely destroyed by rats and unless the evil were remedied
the functions of the Registry Office would be rendered perfectly useless
…
In 1883, Police Magistrate at Alberton, Alfred William
Howitt, a member of a noted family of writers, advised the Law Department
of his serious concerns regarding the dilapidated state of the court house
and the difficulty of storing the records in the following descriptive
terms:
… the roof has lost a number of shingles and independently
of the rain which falls through the holes caused thereby, numbers of
swallows enter the building, which is now in such an extremely filthy
state from their droppings that one room alone remains fit for use.
Mr Dunderdale informs me that he has difficulty in finding a place to
store the records and documents.
Thankfully, records staff today generally work in more
salubrious surroundings!
More recently, when the records of the abandoned Inglewood
Supreme Court were cleared in 1969, termites were found to have eaten
through the floor of the courthouse and into a pile of court registers
three feet high! A water-colour plan of the goldfields had been used to
set the fire in the Magistrate’s office; fortunately, the court
had become disused before the Magistrate had needed to put a match to
it!
In 1936, the Law Department took independent action to
systematise the destruction of unwanted court records, demonstrating an
early application of the concept of scheduled destruction, later to become
a core records management tool implemented through department-wide disposal
schedules, which stood the department in good stead in advance of the
looming war.
The severe economic constraints of the Second World War
brought with them a whole new set of challenges for the survival of Victoria’s
public administration archives. George Brown was appointed to the new
position of State Controller of Salvage in 1940, and quickly sought to
drastically reduce the number of forms in use, and to dramatically expand
the recycling of scrap paper, in response to the urgent wartime need to
economise on the consumption of paper. As he boldly declared:
In most Departments there are large stocks of hoarded
papers as well as bound volumes of ancient records … [and] it
should be possible to make a very substantial clearance in this direction
… Austral Waste Products (associated with Australian Paper Manufacturers
Ltd) … is prepared to purchase, on the basis of 30 [shillings]
per ton, all paper coming forward in this manner.
Austral Waste Products, which might be seen as the archival
Whelan the Wrecker of its day, wasted no time (no pun intended!) in implementing
Brown’s plans, following approval from state Cabinet, but fortunately
for the state’s archives their activity did not go unnoticed by
both the media and Gwyn James, a lecturer in history at the University
of Melbourne, who discovered that some records from some small courthouses
in the Maryborough area had been taken by Austral Waste Products. Acting
on this advice, the following historic resolution was passed at a meeting
on 17 September 1942 involving Mr James, Professor of History Max Crawford
(another key advocate for the proper management of public records in Victoria),
a politician – the Hon. WH Edgar, MLC – and three library
representatives:
… this meeting asks the Premier to take steps to
prevent any further destruction of official documents.
The day after that meeting, Chief Librarian Ernest Pitt
wrote to the Secretary of the Law Department requesting that the Maryborough
court records be held for inspection before pulping, in accordance with
the 1937 re-issue of the 1928 Premier’s Instruction that I referred
to earlier which was still in force, and the Secretary acceded to this
request.
Another significant event that I would like to highlight
was the two-week visit to Melbourne in May 1954 by the eminent American
archivist, Dr Theodore Schellenberg, Director of Archival Management at
the United States National Archives. His expert lectures had a lasting
impact on government department recordkeeping and archival practices.
The Law Department’s representative at these sessions – the
senior clerk of its correspondence branch, Mr H Blake – took careful
notes (which still survive) of Schellenberg’s remarks, and it is
evident that these notes were acted upon.
From that time onwards, the Law Department exerted a very
positive influence on archival policy. This was best exemplified by the
efforts of Secretary Harold Chipman – a close associate of Harry
Nunn, who we will be honouring shortly. Chipman played an important role
as a founding member of the Public Records Advisory Committee, established
in February 1969, which prepared the path towards the Public Records Act
of 1973.
I hope I have been able to show the consistent role played
by the Law Department, and several of its enlightened secretaries, over
many years in championing the need for the proper preservation of public
records in Victoria, at a time when not all government departments adhered
so enthusiastically to the same progressive philosophy.
Today and tomorrow
As one of our more reflective contemporary musicians, Paul Kelly, sang
a few years ago: ‘From little things, big things grow’.
Today, Department of Justice officers
and staff of the Public Record Office work in partnership to control the
number of records created, to ensure that records of purely temporary
significance are separated and discarded as early as possible and essential
records safeguarded, and that arrangements are made for the regular transfer
of non-current files to PROV.
Tomorrow, the Department of Justice is
implementing a leading edge Electronic Document Management (EDM) project,
which will align the department with PROV’s world best practice
Victorian Electronic Records Strategy (VERS) and once again place the
department at the forefront of records management practices in Victorian
public administration.
In preparation for the implementation of this major project,
records awareness information sessions have been held for Departmental
staff in the last few months to:
- provide a brief overview of the EDM Project;
- in relation to recordkeeping concepts, explain the
benefits of good recordkeeping and provide participants with a theoretical
and practical overview of what recordkeeping is; and
- concerning recordkeeping processes and tools, introduce
participants to how they will be doing their recordkeeping in future
in the Department of Justice.
While the Department of Justice is now well positioned
in the brave new world of electronic archiving, we are proud to acknowledge
today the farsighted legacy of the systematic recordkeeping systems which
were set in train by Captain William Lonsdale in 1836, reinforced by a
comprehensive instruction about file-keeping to government departments
in the new colony in 1851, and exemplified in particular by the historic
and symbolic action of a bewhiskered public servant of Irish descent,
Matthew Byrne, when he duly delivered the first set of records from a
government department to the Public Library for safekeeping on 31 July
1903.
The foresight of our forbears is all around us today.
Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to participating
in the rest of the symposium.
Back
to index of papers

|